org Phoronix Test Suite Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 @ 4. Out of Ext4 or btrfs, I would chose btrfs with the snapshots. Btrfs vs. Otherwise use BTRFS. So if you are after the most speed for the buck and if your NAS is already doing RAID 5 or more, you could go for Ext4. Now Fedora just needs to implement it properly like openSUSE. EXT4 is better for small files and day to day use. I had no bad experience myself with btrfs so far, but still have not tried it with anything more complex than raid1 over a long time and while I assume many horror stories out there are just deprecated as btrfs keeps improving, it can do a lot more than ext4. Btrfs also has snapshots so you can revert back to an earlier snapshot easily, say you run arch and some update borks your system (highly unlikely), you can simply revert back to the last good snapshot. Ext4 provides more flexibility in terms of data storage. It takes a second to snapshot, and deletes of a snapshotted tree what takes ext4 26 hours is a few minutes on btrfs. ext4 -fyv /dev/sdXX # man btrfs-convert (read it!) # btrfs-convert /dev/sdXX. With Btrfs you get self healing, snapshots, copy on write, background file system checks, online defragmentation, and much more. Btrfs El sistema de archivos Btrfs nació como sucesor natural de EXT4, su objetivo es sustituirlo eliminando el mayor número de sus limitaciones, sobre todo lo referido al tamaño. Because ext4 can't beat btrfs when it comes to snapshot/delete. XFS is optimized for large file transfers and parallel I/O operations, while ext4 is optimized for general-purpose use with a focus on security. Btrfs, ZFS, and bcachefs are probably your best bets out of the 19 options considered. Supported LBA Sizes (NSID 0x1) Id Fmt Data Metadt Rel_Perf 0 - 512 0 2 1. 对于一些文件系统如Ext4等，在硬盘格式化时就全部确定了，而对于XFS则是动态生成的，BtrfS则是更特别的动态实现。. ZFS certainly can provide higher levels of growth and resiliency vs ext4/xfs. He Installed Linux and partitioned his partition in Ext4 but Hardly after a month he screwed. #11. Some feel that it is not mature enough for production use while there are also early adopters of this. xfs/. 1 million iops for ext4, right in line with the spec of the drive times 2,. Considering switching from a mixture of XFS and ext4, but only to Tux3 once that's merged. I suggest to give the arch wiki a read to get an overview what btrfs provides and where it’s limited in comparison to other solutions. Você pode então configurar a aplicação de cotas usando uma opção de montagem. EXT4 es el sistema de archivos más utilizado en sistemas operativos basados en Linux, este sistema de archivos es transaccional y tiene características muy importantes como que no requiere un procesador muy potente, y tenemos una muy. 4 To 4. Btrfs vs. brown2green. In terms of XFS vs Ext4, XFS is superior to Ext4 in the following. We may have lengthy talk on ext vs XFS vs f2fs and btrfs vs zfs and there are many more points to be mentioned, but for regular users. In my second round I made setups with btrfs on the nvme SSD and luks+btrfs on 2TB HDD as RAID1. My home file share runs zol because I prefer zfs to btrfs and run it at work a lot so I'm much more comfortable with it. BTRFS have some fancy features, and could help you manage your disk better in some automation-future-proof way. XFS, EXT4, and BTRFS are file systems commonly used in Linux-based operating systems. For pure data storage, however, the btrfs is the winner over the ext4, but time still will tell. btrfs sub cr /mnt/@ (the @ alone is the convention for "root directory" in btrfs) btrfs sub cr /mnt/@home. 2. 0, and is just some quality-of-life command line. Multimedia Sanctuaries: With large files as daily bread, ext4 is indispensable. BTRFS bietet, mal abgesehen von der Möglichkeit einer Inline Deduplizierung, beinahe alle Features von ZFS. 5：创建和删除大量文件（文件量一定）. Out of curiosity I have tried BTRFS (still unstable so I can't really expect to be able to use it) and noticed that the read speed is about 150% of ext4 - while write speed. Ext4 for Synology NAS devices, most users should pick Btrfs for the data integrity benefits that it provides. Btrfs trails the other options for a database in terms of latency and throughput. What is the difference between the two file systems, Btrfs and EXT4? This tutorial covers a detailed comparison and a practical tip for you. checksum verification on each file. The logical path from Ext4 is to Btrfs. petronasAMG77 • 1 yr. EXT4 had the best speed at 58MB/s while Btrfs came in slightly behind that at 52MB/s and then ZFS came in at 46MB/s. The XFS File System. 对于一些文件系统如Ext4等，在硬盘格式化时就全部确定了，而对于XFS则是动态生成的，BtrfS则是更特别的动态实现。. 여러 가지의 HDD를 장착하여 사용을 하신다면 사진이나 중요한 자료들을 저장하는 드라이브에는. Phoronix has a ton of reviews, Google for them. #filesystem #ext4 #xfs #linuxExplicación de las diferencias entre sistemas de archivos, en este vídeo se comparan los 2 mas usados en GNU/Linux. XFS 和 ext4 的比较. Ext3, or Ext4) to the Btrfs file system using the btrfs-convert tool. Comparison of file archivers. F2FS vs. I know the latest versions do not setup /home in a separate partition anymore but as a btrfs subvolume instead. ZFS combines a filesystem and volume manager. A tool for managing BTRFS and LVM snapshots. A number of Phoronix readers have been asking about some fresh file-system comparisons on recent kernels. Then again maybe ZFS is the best to use. Neither of the filesystems is better supported by OMV4 or OMV5. The 3 types of file systems support large file size and volume size. but rather comparable to the usage of md-raid underneath or LVM. XFS supports larger file sizes and. On the NVMe SSD, the four-thread FS-Mark was the fastest on XFS followed by Btrfs. . ext3 is the most common format. Depends on the application. Actually, Btrfs might have the upper hand there even, if zstd filesystem compression is used. use ZFS only w/ ECC RAM. 1 fell slightly short of the Linux file-system performance. . El tipo de archivo Ext4 admite tamaños de partición de hasta 1 EiB (Exibyte). 5. 0-040700-generic (x86_64) Unity 7. A File system is one of the most important aspects that af. To recommend a suitable file system, I need to know the exact purpose of /tmp. Each of the tested file-systems were carried out with the default mount options in an out-of-the-box manner. 8ではPhoronixのテストの結果ではXFSが非常に速く、Ext4が遅い。 Una vez que hemos conocido las principales características de EXT4, vamos a hablar sobre Btrfs, el que se conoce como sucesor natural del sistema de archivos EXT4. In fact, BTRFS is also a copy-on-write system to support fault tolerance and file recovery, and provides easy management. ext4 if I don't care about the install. 4TB HDD formatted as NTFS for backuping all other three hard disks. Rationale is native Linux nature, vs xfs being Linux supported. XFS vs. Nowadays btrfs is very stable and the tools to recover from fs corruption have been getting much better as well. Ext4 has been around for a while and is generally more reliable and backward compatible. /etc/fstab /dev/sda5 / ext4 defaults,noatime 0 1 Doing so breaks applications that rely on access time, see fstab#atime options for possible solutions. This is equivalent to specifying -m single on the command. Each file system has its own advantages and disadvantages. 5 inch SSDs, which from what I understand, should work in a SAS chassis. Rep: XFS has unbalanced performance, but in the best use case blows away many other formats. An anonymous reader writes "Phoronix has published Linux filesystem benchmarks comparing XFS, EXT3, EXT4, Btrfs and NILFS2 filesystems. In this test, Btrfs outperformed LVM in every benchmark. If you are looking for advanced features such as data checksumming, snapshots, and data deduplication, then Btrfs may be the better option. Never use ReiserFS on a new system and if you are currently using it, consider converting it to XFS or Btrfs. Hi I have used BTRFS for the first time since March 2023 on my internal archives directory. And generally, files that arent compressible, wont be forcefully compressed. 0 SSD drive used was a 250GB Samsung 850 PRO solid-state drive connected both via SATA. It does its job well. FreeBSD has ports you can install that will allow data transfer of some linux file systems. Otherwise use BTRFS. If you think that you need the advanced features. btrfs is da bomb yo. As Microsoft makes more progress with ReFS on Windows 11, Linux is also getting performance optimizations and improvements on some of its major file systems, namely, F2FS, Btrfs, and EXT4. However benchmarks test quite narrow parameters which may not be reflected by running an OS. To have best performance use noatime mount option, and I also recommend to use mount option. 17現在、Ext4と比べ特にBtrfsが遅かったりはしない。SSD上の動作であればむしろ有利なくらいだ。 つまり、Ext4のほうが速く、Btrfsが遅いカーネルもある。 例を示そう。 Linux5. 2. ago. However, Ext3 lacks advanced file system features like extent blocking mapping, dynamic allocation inode, and defragmentation. After deciding to use LVM2 as volumemanager on our servers there was also the wish for an online resizeable filesystem. - Linux Kernel 5. 6. But. List of archive formats. 6 Comments With FS-Mark there was a very noticeable drop with the XFS file-system with KPTI and Retpoline enabled while EXT4 saw the second largest drop while Btrfs and. 6：顺序. A snapshot is a subvolume that shares its data and metadata with another subvolume, using COW capabilities. Thanks again! Unless you're doing something crazy, ext4 or btrfs would both be fine. You will see the difference especially with autosaves in Satisfactory for an example. The Ext4 file system is a very old file system and it has been used on the Linux operating system for a long, long time. Vide. 1. To mount the XFS file system so that it uses the external journal, specify the -o logdev=device option to the. It lived enough, time to move on. Ext4 focuses on providing a reliable and stable file system with good performance. i use the nas to store backups (the tools created a bunch of symbolic links) (not from synology) and run a few dockers (a. While RAID 5 and 6 can be compared to RAID Z. You get awesome functionality like cp --reflink and btrfs subvolume snapshot -r and btrfs send and btrfs receive . Ext4中没有这种内置的压缩支持。 Btrfs直接从磁盘删除重复数据，而Ext4不能这样做， Btrfs支持. btrfs seems to write more data to a disk than ext4. It has features that can scale better than ext4 and is even preferred over ZFS by some users. BTRFS also had somewhat higher latency than EXT4, meaning that it took longer for files to be accessed on the file system. And BRTFS has some really nice features in that area. ran defragment utility to compress all existing files. XFS Storage : 2019-01-07: FreeBSD ZFS vs. Pros: Individual file size: 16GB to 2TB. Unless you're doing something crazy, ext4 or btrfs would both be fine. ZFS on FreeBSD may be faster than BTRFS on Linux. Add a comment. 29 release of the Linux kernel. 특히 시놀로지에서는 데이터 보호와 백업의 용이함을 장점으로 내세운 Btrfs를 권장합니다. However, Ext3 lacks advanced file system features like extent blocking mapping, dynamic allocation inode, and defragmentation. Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, and XFS were tested in their out-of-the-box state / default mount options. My current setup is /@ for the rootfs, /@home for home dir, works great. EXT4 and XFS show similarities in some features. ZFS can also send and receive file system snapshots, a process which allows users to optimize their disk space. With all of the major file-systems seeing clean-up work during the Linux 4. The only concern I have is performance, maybe btrfs in a HDD will be really slow. I've seen benchmarks (eg: this one) that put btrfs considerably slower than ext4. File-systems tested on the NVMe SSD included Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, XFS, and NTFS. my oldest one a OCZ Agility3 60GB is. With Bcachefs core development being done and the possibility of this file-system being mainlined soon, here are some fresh benchmarks of this file-system compared to Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, XFS, and ZFS On Linux. BTRFS hatte auch etwas höhere Latenz als EXT4, was bedeutet, dass es länger dauerte, bis Dateien auf dem Dateisystem zugegriffen werden konnten. Además, el rendimiento en una sola unidad giratoria generalmente tendrá la unidad como el eslabón más débil. However, we also must admit that Btrfs has many advantages that Ext4 doesn’t have, for example: 8. Linux 5. There was obviously some caching / lack of committing to disk involved that led to faster performance while the Btrfs file-system was in line with real-world expectations out of the. A：BTRFS系能最差，不到20 seeks/sec. Small to Medium Enterprises: While ext3 suffices for businesses with modest data needs, scalability visionaries would do well considering ext4. So I think you should have no strong preference, except to consider what you are familiar with and what is best documented. 10. It's a mature filesystem and offers online defragmentation and can. Improve this answer. Block sub-allocation and Tail packing. Small_Light_9964 • 1 yr. There was a higher risk than upon disconnection or loss of power than some of the files are truncated. I've never had an issue with either, and currently run btrfs + luks. X percent… The more modern filesystems of BTRFS and ZFS not only have data integrity features but also the inline compression pushes the efficiency past 100% in many cases. The question is XFS vs EXT4. In a significant data corruption, Ext2 and Ext3 file systems are more possible and easy to recover data due to their data redundancy compared with Ext4. 3 with zfs-2. 1 Like. BTW, transparent compression can offset much of the performance penalty between using a fs like btrfs or ZFS and a more traditional fs like ext4 or xfs, depending on your workload. my nextcloud site). Each of the tested file-systems were carried out with the default mount options in an out-of-the-box manner. Ext4 is built on older technology, so it lacks modern file-system features found in systems like E2FS and BtrFS. Let’s talk about the advantages Btrfs boasts over the traditional and more popular ext4 filesystem. Also, server raid originally md raid5 (4x4TB NAS drives) with XFS had taken all day to build, but creating btrfs-raid10 was seconds. 0 File-System. Backups and CoW, are why I use btrfs. My current setup is /@ for the rootfs, /@home for home dir, works great. If not, stick with EXT4, or other more 'classic' solutions. BTRFS VS EXT4 performance in Raid 1. ago. One of the biggest differences between them is that their supported operating system. 3TB HDD formatted as NTFS for main files. are two different decisions you have to make. Btrfs is especially nice for storing games because of deduplication, ZSTD compression (which ended up saving me about. Você deve ativar as cotas na montagem inicial. As mentioned above, when picking between Btrfs vs. For the most. Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, and XFS were tested in their out-of-the-box state / default mount options. So können kleinere. EXT4は、Linuxベースのオペレーティングシステムのメインファイルシステムです。zfs or btrfs or ext4. If you need data persistent even after reboot, tmpfs is excluded. It's a 64-bit, journaling filesystem that has been built into the Linux kernel since 2001 and offers high performance for large filesystems and high degrees of concurrency (i. Ext4 tiene el registro en diario de forma predeterminada y es probable que los nuevos usuarios no sepan cómo deshabilitarlo para guardar lecturas / escrituras en sus. Though not as large of a difference when comparing to an SD card. In the time since I chose ext4 for these systems, btrfs seems to have come a long way, so the choice may be harder today. BTRFS subvolumes and the way a distro like Opensuse handles it, by using subvolumes and snapshotting on upgrades, is really nice. Data Colossi & Data Centers: Ext4 is non-negotiable for handling extensive data transactions. 0 and particularly with F2FS seeing fixes as a result of it being picked up by Google for support on Pixel devices, I was curious to see. But. All of these Linux. Does that mean that if I'm using btrfs snapshots, it will not save parity data for any snapshots other than the current state of the drive, that it will only save parity data for one snapshot other than the current state of the drive, or that it will fail entirely?Generally, would go with btrfs. I currently have a ds1819+, currently, i have 8 x 4tb (5400rpm) 32G of ram 2x2tb nvme cachethe system is super fragmented and super slow synology says that i need to backup everything and recreate the volume. EXT4 vs. ago. That however would disable a lot of the Btrfs features. 1 / Windows 95 OSR2 (OEM Service Release 2) and then later in Windows 98. 6. 1. However, XFS is amazingly fast in the insertion phase as well as the workload execution phase. In practice, I don't consider the Btrfs slowdown really relevant for desktop usage on an SSD, VM performance aside. 1 / Windows 95 OSR2 (OEM Service Release 2) and then later in Windows 98. If you have a NAS or Home server, BTRFS or XFS can offer benefits but then you'll have to do some extensive reading first. #6. The 3TB HDD are ext4. Ext4 is probably the final evolution of the ext filesystem (which started with ext, then ext2, ext3, and now ext4). 8 snapshot as of last week. ext4 was supposed to be a stop gap until a better Linux filesystem came along. I've read and have anecdotally (not scientific and could be affected by other things) experienced Btrfs being slower than ext4. BtrFS refers to B-Tree File Systems developed by Oracle to establish an alternative to the Ext series. BTRFS has better backup capabilities, but is considered less stable, despite it working for me just fine with my testing of it. btrfs 可以支援 snapshot, 但 ext4 不行, 如果一開始就採用 ext4, 日後如果要使用 snapshot 功能, 必須將 NAS 的資料備份出來, 重新 format 成 btrfs 格式. For storage, XFS is great and. XFS back then was buggy and error-prone, to say the least. Utilice. For storage, XFS is great and sometimes has higher performance than EXT4. Its not faster or more stable then the other two. Yes, both BTRFS and ZFS have advanced features that are missing in EXT4. ext4 ファイルシステムは、2 32 個を超える inode をサポートしません。 XFS は inode を動的に割り当てます。It provides a basic Unix- like file system for Linux, using virtual directories to handle physical devices, and storing data in fixed-length blocks on the physical devices. This pre-dates xfsprogs 3. 2 SSD as yesterday's testing and using the same 4. If not, stick with EXT4, or other more 'classic' solutions. A execução do comando quotacheck em um sistema de. Compared to Ext4, XFS has a relatively poor performance for single threaded, metadata-intensive workloads. Copy. Or btrfs, which is making some serious headway again with it becoming the default filesystem for Fedora. Both Btrfs and Ext4 have their own advantages. Ext4 is the fourth version of the Ext(Extended) File System for Linux and is probably the most well-known file system for Linux out there. Language: Format: Red Hat Training. Regarding filesystems. An efficient file system is necessary for everyday system processes. Btrfs El sistema de archivos Btrfs nació como sucesor natural de EXT4, su objetivo es sustituirlo eliminando el mayor número de sus limitaciones, sobre todo lo referido al tamaño. One of the benefits of Btrfs is the ease of managing Btrfs filesystems without the need to unmount the filesystem or restart Docker. - Bảo vệ dữ liệu. Complementing the benchmarks from yesterday are some more results today with Bcachefs compared to EXT4, Btrfs, XFS, and F2FS with testing being done from the same Intel M. Comparison of archive formats. Either way you go, just leave EXT4 where it is, in the ground. Both Btrfs and Ext4 have their own advantages. There are several filesystems such as ext4, f2fs, btrfs. ZFS. No swap because 16GB RAM is enough for me. Btrfs was 107% faster in initial read scores and 24% faster in initial write scores. Written by Michael Larabel in Storage on 20 January 2018. XFS vs EXT4!This is a very common question when it comes to Linux filesystems and if you’re looking for the difference between XFS and EXT4, here is a quick summary:. While I have used btrfs balanced, timeshift and my other develop tool scripts for managing borg backups rely a lot on standard linux file. So now I can boot up into a snapshot. Linux 5. To be clear, I am using RAID0 with two SSDs with strip size of 256Kb. 8ではPhoronixのテストの結果ではXFSが非常に速く、Ext4が遅い。Una vez que hemos conocido las principales características de EXT4, vamos a hablar sobre Btrfs, el que se conoce como sucesor natural del sistema de archivos EXT4. Journaling ensures file system integrity after system crashes (for example, due to power outages) by keeping a record of file system. ZFS ain't bad, but this whole btrfs data loss myth needs to stop. XFS as a similar featureset filesystem manages around 99. Unix, etc. BTRFS and ZFS are metadata vs. The Ext4 file system is a very old file system and it has been used on the Linux operating system for a long, long time. btrfs turns off metadata duplication on a single device when /sys/block/ device /queue/rotational is zero for the single specified device. We believe that btrfs has the correct feature set and roadmap to serve Ceph in the long-term, but XFS and ext4. For the adventurous: you can define block devices on btrfs and use ext4 on those block devices (ext4 on btrfs). Indie games often too get fair amount of gain. The thing is I'm putting /home in a separate HDD. スナップショットの取得機能LVMで搭載されてた増分、差分のバックアップ機能ext3,ext4からbtrfsへの変換と逆変換機能SSDへの最適化RAID機能（今まではmd mdadmなどのデバイスマッパーでしか出来な. So, Btrfs has built-in RAID support and therefore this feature is inherent in it. Squid mentioned above that we can create a . Você deve ativar as cotas na montagem inicial. This file system enables drive pooling, automatic snapshot, transparent compression, and online defragmentation. Resizing (growing) is possible with btrfs and xfs. However benchmarks test quite narrow parameters which may not be reflected by running an OS. BTRFS have some fancy features, and could help you manage your disk better in some automation-future-proof way. EXT4 being the “safer” choice of the two, it is by the most commonly used FS in linux based systems, and most applications are developed and tested on EXT4. This feature allows for increased capacity and reliability. Ext4 Filesystem: A filesystem that is well known for its performance and reliability with added metadata and checksums. 0 File-System Benchmarks: Btrfs vs. In this episode of the CyberGizmo I benchmark the 4 filesystems chosen by Phoronix for his testing and use my own workloads to compare and contrast them. They both use delayed allocation to achieve file fragmentation while both do not support mounted snapshots. ago. Main features: Data protection features, including snapshot, replication, and point-in-time recovery. However ZFS does come at one major downside, it needs more resources in just about every way one can imagine, ZFS is best with more disks, more RAM, more CPU, more Bandwidth, more SSD’s for caching…. ZFS is faster than ext4, and is a great filesystem candidate for boot partitions! I would go with ZFS, and not look back. It is the default file system in RHEL 6, Debian 7, Ubuntu 18 and so on. Btrfs is a bit slower with writes because of its Copy-on-write nature, but just as fast when it comes to reads. Difference between Ext4 vs Btrfs filesystems on Linux. • 2 yr. Windows users don’t have much of a choice regarding a file system. 5. Because of that, the Ext4 file system is very stable. ext4 is certainly is much more stable than btrfs. Short answer: under GNU/Linux, you should use a GNU/Linux native file system, such as ext4, XFS or btrfs, as your root partition, for stability and security. Fuck writes blocking reads. Conclusion: Last time I ran these tests, xfs and ext4 pulled very similar results, and both were miles ahead of btrfs. XFS vs. Btrfs and Ext4 are Linux file systems but are extremely. In this Video we are going to cover Linux File System Types - Ext2,Ext3,Ext4,XFS,BTRFS | Linux File Systems Explained | Linux Tutorial for Beginners #linuxt. ^ Microsoft first introduced FAT32 in MS-DOS 7. As I have mentioned earlier, snapshots are created with minimal size due to the use of copy-on-write. On the SSD, Bcachefs came in behind EXT4 again but faster than Btrfs while XFS and F2FS were the fastest for SQLite on this consumer. The XFS filesystem is the default filesystem in RHEL, CentOS, and other RHEL-distros such as Oracle Linux, Rocky Linux, and AlmaLinux. 7 - EXT4 vs. The Ext4 filesystem does not support creating snapshots of the filesystem. EXT4 is better for small files and day to day use. Each of the five file-systems were tested on the same NVM Express SSD from the Linux 4. Find a motherboard with enough drive ports or real sata controllers to run all the drives. all kinds for nice features (like extents, subsecond timestamps) which ext3 does not have. XFS does not require extensive reading. 29 release of the Linux kernel. For example, xfs cannot shrink. I think the consensus these days is it’s good for single drive and raid 1. Btrfs lacks maturity and stability at the time of this writing but is more feature-rich compared to EXT4. By far, XFS can handle large data better than any other filesystem on this list and do it reliably too. 6,861. 하지만 리소스 문제나 호환성 등을 생각한다면 EXT4도 포기할 수 없죠. 2. 15 Comparing KPTI/Retpoline. There won't be any noticeable difference. It would be interesting to see a new benchmark result of CoW filesystems BTRFS vs ZFS in real world 2022. What do I use? ext4. 4 HDD RAID performance per his request with Btrfs, EXT4, and XFS while using consumer HDDs and an AMD Ryzen APU setup that could work out for a NAS type low-power system for anyone else that may be interested. Btrfs is always faster than ext4 when used with the nodatacow mount option. Ext4. EXT4 is the successor of EXT3, the most used Linux file system. So I moved everything off of it and formatted it into XFS and ate the 0,5% space loss for peace of mind. And ext3. So với Ext4, Btrfs hoạt động ổn đinh hơn, dễ dàng quản lý hơn và tích hợp nhiều ứng dụng hỗ trợ tốt cho doanh nghiệp Quy mô lớn. Have snapper to create pre/post BTRFS and LVM snapshots. It's a filesystem which resides entirely in your RAM. 4. FUSE-based file systems. I'ved tested compress=off/lz4, dedup=on/off and serveral Cache/Log constellations on 256GB SSD. Same could be said of reads, but if you have a TON of memory in the server that's greatly mitigated and work well. The four hard drives used for testing were 6TB Seagate IronWolf NAS (ST6000VN0033. Ext4 比 Btrfs 更穩定嗎？ 儘管在撰寫本文時 Btrfs 缺乏穩定性和. 3. What concerns me is reports that its heavier on ssd's due to all the extra metadata tracking etc. I would reccomend btrfs only if you need the extra features that ext4 doesn't provide like compression or snapshots. 0. EXT4 lacks more robust features but is stable and well-supported on all Linux operating systems. EXT4 vs. ran btrfs balance to balance all btrfs volumes. Compare Btrfs vs ZFS and 17 other options side by side to learn "What are the best file systems?" Introducing . at least as much as ext4 (which isn’t all that trusted by SUSE). The SATA 3. EXT4 vs. But shrinking is no problem for ext4 or btrfs. Also BRTFS compresses the file system using less space compared to EXT4 but again the tradeoff is it uses more computer. - Tính năng tự khôi phục tập tin.